Ruoyu Sun's
Thoughts on design, code and gamedev

A Glimpse of Angular.js $scope via Example

24 Aug 2013

Angular.js is nice. I especially feel so after I started to write Backbone.js again - I had to maintain a project written in Backbone.js. Every time I write Backbone.js, I cannot help imagining how simple and easy the code and test will be if it is written in Angular.js.

However, Angular.js does have its own complexities. One of the most confusing part is its $scope life cycle. Let me use a real-life example. A few days ago, I was building this feature: when the user clicks a button, an input box appears and the focus is on the input box.

If you do this in plain jQuery, the JavaScript code looks like this (full implementation on JSFiddle):

$(function(){
    $('#show-menu').click(function() {
        $menu = $('#menu');
        $menu.show();
        $menu.find('input.to-focus').focus();
    });
});

The code is simple and straightforward.

In Angular.js, you are not supposed to manipulate DOM in controller. Instead, you should write directive. Your code will look like this (JSFiddle):

<div ng-controller="MenuCtrl" ng-app="App">
    <button ng-click="showMenu = true">Show Menu</button>
    <div ng-show="showMenu">
        <input type="text" focus-if="showMenu">
    </div>
</div>


app = angular.module('App', []);
app.controller('MenuCtrl', function () {});
app.directive('focusIf', [function () {
    return function focusIf(scope, element, attr) {
        scope.$watch(attr.focusIf, function (newVal) {
            if (newVal) {
                element[0].focus();
                // You can write element.focus() if jQuery is available
            }
        });
    }
}]);

We write our own directive called “focusIf” and will trigger a focus event whenever the expression is true. It’s simple and elegant, until you realize it does not work.

After some debug, you can find out that element[0].focus() is called. But why it does not work? Then you spend more time and realize the input box is not on the page yet - Of course you cannot focus on a display: none input box. Now your aim is simple: trigger the focus event after the DOM is updated.

To help you understand how to achieve this, let me pull out the Angular.js runtime diagram (from official document)

Angular.js Runtime Concepts

This is what happens when the user clicks the button:

  1. $scope.showMenu is set to true, Angular.js calls $apply() and enters $digest loop.
  2. $evalAsync queue is processed. Since this queue is empty in this case, nothing is done.
  3. $watch list is processed. We have two watchers: ngShow and our own focusIf. The order of execution is not really guaranteed (although there is an order). In this case, the empirical evidence suggests that focusIf is executed before ngShow
  4. Since the $digest loop can cause further changes, the loop will continue until everything is processed (i.e. $evalAsync queue is empty and watchers find no more changes).
  5. Angular.js loop exits, browser renders the DOM.

To make sure element[0].focus() will work, we need to make sure it is executed after ngShow watcher. The recommended way to do this is $evalAsync (JSFiddle):

app = angular.module('App', []);
app.controller('MenuCtrl', function () {});
app.directive('focusIf', [function () {
    return function focusIf(scope, element, attr) {
        scope.$watch(attr.focusIf, function (newVal) {
            if (newVal) {
                scope.$evalAsync(function() {
                    element[0].focus();
                });
            }
        });
    }
}]);

This is the new flow:

  1. $scope.showMenu is set to true, Angular.js calls $apply() and enters $digest loop.
  2. $evalAsync queue is processed. Since this queue is empty in this case, nothing is done.
  3. $watch list is processed. focusIf is executed, pushing element[0].focus() to the $evalAsync queue, then ngShow is executed (again ,the order of watcher execution is not really guaranteed).
  4. The loop checks the exit condition: 1) Can watchers find any more changes? Nope. 2) Is $evalAsync queue empty? Nope
  5. $evalAsync queue is processed. element[0].focus() is executed in this iteration.
  6. $watch list is processed. There is no more watcher to process.
  7. Angular.js loop exits, browser renders the DOM.

With this, we make sure element[0].focus() is executed after ngShow, the focus works!

However, if you’ve googled around on this problem, several posts recommend using $timeout to solve it (JSFiddle):

app = angular.module('App', []);
app.controller('MenuCtrl', function () {});
app.directive('focusIf', ['$timeout', function ($timeout) {
    return function focusIf(scope, element, attr) {
        scope.$watch(attr.focusIf, function (newVal) {
            if (newVal) {
                $timeout(function() {
                    element[0].focus();
                });
            }
        });
    }
}]);

It will also work, but is not really recommended. This works because Javascript is single-threaded. All the asynchronous events are pushed into an event queue when triggered. Javascript will execute them one by one. $timeout(Fn) is equivalent to setTimeout(Fn, 0), which tells the browser to execute Fn as soon as possible by pushing it into the event queue right away. This does not mean the execution will start now as event queue might be processing other code.

  1. $scope.showMenu is set to true, Angular.js calls $apply() and enters $digest loop.
  2. $evalAsync queue is processed. Since this queue is empty in this case, nothing is done.
  3. $watch list is processed. focusIf is executed, pushing element[0].focus() to the browsr event queue (the big loop), then ngShow is executed (again ,the order of watcher execution is not really guaranteed).
  4. The loop checks the exit condition: 1) Can watchers find any more changes? Nope 2) Is $evalAsync queue empty? Yes
  5. Angular.js loop exits, browser renders the DOM.
  6. Browser goes on processing the next event in the queue, which is element[0].focus() (As we use $timeout, which is provided by Angular.js and invokes $apply, therefore the $digest loop will be invoked but nothing is done since $evalAsync is empty and no changes are detected by watchers. We can replace $timeout with browser’s window.setTimeout and it will also work. However, if the code we executed has impact to the Angular.js world, for example, trigger a watcher, using window.setTimeout will not achieve this since it does not enter Angular.js’s $digest loop. You need to call $scope.$apply() explicitly, which is essentially what $timeout does).
  7. The input box is focused and the processing is done, browser moves on.

The main difference of $timeout(Fn) is that it does not uses Angular.js’s own $digest loop. Instead, it uses browser’s native event loop. The code will executed after the DOM is rendered, which is outside the $digest loop. It is essentially a hack that makes use of Javascript runtime (it’s not specific to Angular.js). Since Angular.js has it own “proper” way to handle the scheduling. It is recommended to stick to that.

This example is quite simple, yet it illustrates the whole life cycle of Angular.js $digest loop and also in the context of Javascript event loop. If you find this intimidating, don’t worry, 90% of the time you will be dealing with the bright side of Angular.js: easy data-binding, easy code reuse via directive and easy testing - Angular.js magic just works. However, as the application grows bigger and bigger, you do have to dive into the “dark” side of Angular.js from time to time. The more often you dive into such cases, the more you will understand about Angular.js.

In case I made any mistakes, please discuss on HN.

If you have comment, you can post it HN (link can be found at the end of the essay), send me an email at hi AT ruoyusun DOT com or ping me on Twitter @insraq.